Software Comparison

AttendIQ vs HammerTech

HammerTech runs safety on some of the largest programmes in the world. AttendIQ runs compliance and attendance for UK contractors, and produces the timesheets as well as the evidence.

Last updated September 2026. Based on publicly available information from both vendors' own websites.

Best for UK contractors
AttendIQ
Best for

UK principal contractors and specialist subcontractors with 50 to 3,000 workers who want compliance and attendance in one platform, priced publicly, live the same week. Built around CSCS Smart Check, CDM 2015 and the CIJC Working Rule Agreement rather than adapted to them.

HammerTech
Best for

Large and multinational builders running complex programmes who want a dedicated safety platform with global consistency across regions, and who have the procurement process to support an enterprise purchase. Over 1,000 customers and 50,000 projects worldwide.

Feature comparison

Feature AttendIQ HammerTech
Digital site inductions Mobile, multi-language, versioned Yes, a core strength
Permits, inspections, incidents 15 standard forms plus custom builder Yes, a core strength
Subcontractor access cost Free, included in the PC licence Free, no per-seat fees
Time and attendance GPS clock-in, kiosk, offline queue Not marketed as a capability
Timesheets and payroll export Overtime rules, CIJC ladders, payroll export Not marketed as a capability
CSCS Smart Check verification UK card verification built in Partial Credential tracking, not UK-specific
Access blocked at clock-in on rule failure All failing reasons returned Partial Authorisation status tracked
Right to work records Held against the worker, not the employer Partial Document management
Drug and alcohol management Test records, auto-suspension rules Partial
Fatigue and Working Time monitoring Configurable thresholds Partial
Published pricing £4.50–£7.00 per worker per month Demo request only
Geographic focus United Kingdom Global: Europe, North America, Australia
Typical customer size 50 to 3,000 workers including supply chain Large and enterprise builders, 1,000+ customers worldwide

HammerTech entries reflect what the vendor publishes on its own website as at September 2026. Where a capability is marked as not marketed, that means we could not find it described publicly, not that it is known to be absent. Check with HammerTech directly before deciding on that basis.

The honest starting point: they overlap more than they differ

Both products do inductions, permits, inspections and incident reporting well, and both include subcontractors at no extra cost. HammerTech makes a point of that on its homepage, and so do we. Anyone telling you that supply chain licensing is the deciding factor between these two has not checked.

The real differences are narrower and more useful: what the software is expected to produce, which country's rules it was written against, and whether you can find out what it costs.

Scope: safety platform or workforce platform

HammerTech describes itself as a construction safety platform. Its workflows run from induction and pre-start through to incident tracking and reporting, and it does that across whole enterprises. What it does not market is time and attendance: clock-in, hours, overtime and payroll are outside the picture it presents.

AttendIQ covers the same site-safety ground and then keeps going. The clock-in that proves a worker was inducted and carded is the same clock-in that produces their hours, applies the overtime rules, and exports to payroll. For a contractor currently running safety in one system and timesheets in another, that is the difference between two subscriptions and one.

The question to ask: do you want a safety system, or do you want the site record to produce your timesheets as well? If the answer is a safety system for a global estate, HammerTech is a serious product. If it is one record that covers compliance and hours for a UK workforce, that is what AttendIQ is.

UK rules, written in rather than configured in

HammerTech is explicit that it adapts to different regions and compliance frameworks. That flexibility is the right design for a platform operating across Europe, North America and Australia, and it is a genuine engineering achievement. It also means UK specifics arrive as configuration.

AttendIQ only does the UK. CSCS cards are verified against CSCS Smart Check rather than recorded as a document. Overtime runs against the CIJC Working Rule Agreement. Right to work, CDM 2015 records and the RIDDOR reporting path are built in because there is no other jurisdiction to accommodate. For a regional contractor in England or Wales that is usually less work to set up and less to get wrong.

£4.50
Per worker per month, AttendIQ Essential
Same day
AttendIQ deployment, no hardware
£0
Per subcontractor, on both platforms

Pricing you can check

HammerTech does not publish prices. The route in is a demo request form, which is a normal enterprise motion and no criticism of the product. It does mean you cannot compare it to what you are paying now without starting a sales conversation.

AttendIQ publishes everything: Essential from £4.50 per worker per month, Complete from £7.00, a one-off setup fee of £1,000 plus VAT on Essential or £1,500 plus VAT on Complete, and minimum annual fees that set a floor rather than a minimum worker count. There is a calculator on the pricing page that will tell you the number for your workforce without asking for an email address.

Scale, in both directions

HammerTech reports over 1,000 customers, 50,000 projects and five million worker inductions. That is a track record AttendIQ does not have, and if you are running a multinational estate where consistency across regions is the problem to solve, it matters a great deal.

The inverse is also true. A regional contractor with 200 direct workers and fifteen subcontractors is not the customer that scale was built for, and enterprise procurement is a slow way to solve a problem that starts next Monday.

The verdict

If you are a large or multinational builder who wants a dedicated safety platform with global consistency, HammerTech is a strong choice and is rightly well regarded. If you are a UK contractor who wants compliance and attendance in the same record, written against UK regulation, priced publicly and live on site this week, that is the gap AttendIQ was built for.

Frequently asked questions

HammerTech is a global construction safety platform covering inductions, pre-starts, permits, inspections and incidents. AttendIQ covers the same site-safety ground for the UK and adds time and attendance through to payroll export, built around CSCS Smart Check and the CIJC Working Rule Agreement. The clearest practical difference is that AttendIQ produces your timesheets as well as your compliance record.

No. HammerTech states on its own site that there are no per-seat fees and that every worker and subcontractor is included. AttendIQ works the same way. Supply chain licensing is not a point of difference between these two products.

It depends on scale and on what you need the software to produce. HammerTech suits large and multinational builders wanting a dedicated safety platform across regions. AttendIQ suits UK contractors of roughly 50 to 3,000 workers wanting compliance and attendance in one place, published pricing, and deployment within the week.

Not at the time of writing - the route in is a demo request. AttendIQ publishes its prices: Essential from £4.50 per worker per month, Complete from £7.00, plus a one-off setup fee of £1,000 + VAT on Essential or £1,500 + VAT on Complete.

Compliance and hours,
in one record.

Published pricing, no hardware, live on your first site the same week. See it running on your sites in a 30-minute demo.

More comparisons: AttendIQ vs Assignar · AttendIQ vs Biosite · AttendIQ vs Boxcore · AttendIQ vs Causeway Donseed · AttendIQ vs Chime · AttendIQ vs Datascope · AttendIQ vs MSite · AttendIQ vs Spreadsheets